|
Panel Blasts IU Outsourcing at Labor Studies Brown Bag
Nineteen campus and community members attended a panel discussion on Sept. 27 titled “Outsourcing Jobs at IU: Issues and Prospects.” Panelists included Peter Kaczmarczyk, president of CWA Local 4730, Dallas Murphy, president of AFSCME Local 832, and Pat Brantlinger, Indiana University Professor Emeritus of English
Kaczmarczyk led off by arguing that recent outsourcing efforts at IU have been “ideologically driven” by true believers who think “the private sector does it better.” The one-time, short-term influx of cash IU gained from recent outsourcings comes at the expense of employees’ wages, benefits and union protections and threatens to place a burden on tax-supported social services, he said. He noted that IU Vice President Terry Clapacs is on record as saying that cutting benefits would be the biggest source of savings from outsourcing.
Kaczmarczyk warned students they’d be wrong to think outsourcing will help control costs. The ready cash from privatizing the bookstore and motor pool is committed to infrastructure improvements and new science buildings, he pointed out. Meanwhile, reports have begun to trickle in of reduced convenience and lower-quality service for students and staff as a result of privatization. (See story on page 1) IU administrators seem ready to turn the university into a collection of “strip malls with an occasional classroom in between,” Kaczmarczyk quipped.
The cost in terms of employee loyalty, welfare, and workplace satisfaction is also significant, Kaczmarczyk argued. “We now have two classes of employees at IU, working next to one another within the same bargaining units, with different levels of pay, benefits and protections,” he noted. “The staff feel cut off and abandoned. The loss of fee courtesy in particular reduces the affordability of education for the families of IU employees.” And despite the administration’s claim that no employee would lose his or her job, “current IU employees will be pushed out the door in the long run,” he predicted. “The consulting committees set up by the administration to help it consider whether and how to privatize have included almost no service staff,” he added. “The administration seems willing to treat the staff like disposable components.”
Next up was Murphy, who stated it was “morally wrong to sell jobs for profit.” In addition, he argued, members of the university community are receiving “substandard service due to the inadequate accountability” that comes with privatizing campus units. “Given the hefty tuition students pay, they deserve the best service possible,” Murphy affirmed. He encouraged concerned citizens to continue the fight: “Community resistance
|